This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Landgrafet al. and Lui et al. later verify expression in human [4-5].
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .
This human miRNA was predicted by computational methods using conservationwith mouse and Fugu rubripes sequences . Expression of the excised miRhas been validated in zebrafish, and the ends mapped by cloning. Dostieet al. independently cloned this sequence in human but misnamed thesequence miR-172 (the sequence is unrelated to MIR172 from Arabidopsis). The sequence maps to human chromosome 1. Human miR-34a waspreviously named miR-34 here and in , but is renamed to clarifyhomology with the alternatively named mouse sequence (MIR:MI0000584). Themature sequence shown here represents the most commonly cloned form fromlarge-scale cloning studies .